Matkules lidlauks

The closure was a direct result of major economic and political shifts following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the restoration of Latvia's independence. The airfield's primary function was to support the Soviet-era collective farm (kolkhoz) system with agricultural aviation. With the dissolution of these large-scale, state-run farms and the subsequent collapse of the centralized agricultural aviation infrastructure (which was part of Aeroflot), the airfield lost its purpose and became economically obsolete.

The airfield is defunct and not certified for any aviation activities. The single asphalt runway, approximately 400 meters long, is still clearly visible but is in a state of severe disrepair, with numerous cracks, potholes, and significant vegetation growth. The site is now private property and is used for agricultural purposes. Satellite imagery and local observations confirm that the runway surface is frequently used for storing agricultural supplies, such as large hay or silage bales, and for parking farm machinery. It is completely unsuitable for aircraft operations.

Matkules lidlauks was a typical Soviet-era agricultural airfield, part of a vast network built across the Latvian SSR and the wider Soviet Union. Its main purpose was to serve as a base for agricultural aircraft, predominantly Antonov An-2 biplanes, which performed tasks like crop dusting, fertilizing, and pest control for the local collective farms. These airfields were crucial for the Soviet model of large-scale, mechanized agriculture. While primarily a civilian facility, its existence was part of the broader Soviet infrastructure in the region. The airfield never handled commercial passenger or significant military operations; its significance lies in its role as a relic of the Soviet agricultural system in rural Latvia.

There are no known official plans, proposals, or prospects for reopening Matkules lidlauks. The cost to restore the runway, pavement, and any associated infrastructure to meet modern aviation standards would be substantial. Given its remote location, short runway length, and the lack of any clear economic, commercial, or strategic demand, a reopening is considered highly improbable. The land is likely to continue being used for private agricultural purposes.