Kankan, GN 🇬🇳 Closed Airport
GUXN
-
1267 ft
GN-K
Loading...
Loading...GPS Code: Not available
Local Code: Not available
Location: 10.394° N, -9.3038° E
Continent: AF
Type: Closed Airport
Keywords: KNN GUXN
It appears there is some confusion regarding the ICAO code for Kankan Airport. While your query specifies GUXN, several sources indicate that GUXN is the old ICAO code for Kankan Airport, which is now considered closed, with the runway potentially repurposed as a street. The currently operational airport serving Kankan is identified by IATA: KNN and ICAO: GUXD. Traveler reviews and specific experiences directly linked to GUXN are therefore scarce to non-existent, as it is no longer an active commercial airport.
The information below pertains to "Kankan Airport" (likely referring to the operational GUXD/KNN), but direct traveler sentiment and detailed reviews are very limited.
Overall traveler sentiment and satisfaction at Kankan Airport (GUXD/KNN) is difficult to ascertain due to a lack of recent, specific traveler reviews. General information suggests it is a smaller airport primarily serving regional needs.
Given the very limited direct traveler reviews, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive summary of recent traveler experiences at Kankan Airport. The available data primarily consists of airport operational details and AI-predicted wait times rather than firsthand passenger accounts of facilities, cleanliness, or overall satisfaction.
Researching traveler experiences online...
Loading weather data...
| Designation | Length | Width | Surface | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
10/28 |
9843 ft | 144 ft | ASP/GVL | Active |
| Type | Description | Frequency |
|---|
Approximately in the late 1970s or early 1980s. The exact date is not well-documented, but the closure directly coincided with the construction and opening of its replacement, the new Kankan Diankana Airport (ICAO: GUXK, IATA: KNN).
The primary reason for closure was urban encroachment and safety. GUXN was located in what became the center of the city of Kankan. As the city expanded rapidly, buildings and population density grew right up to the airport's boundaries. This made flight operations increasingly hazardous, limited any possibility of runway extension to accommodate larger aircraft, and created significant noise issues for residents. Consequently, a decision was made to build a new, more modern airport at a safer distance (approx. 15 km southeast) from the city center.
The airport is completely defunct and the site has been fully redeveloped. Satellite imagery of the coordinates (10.394, -9.3038) shows that the former airport grounds are now a dense urban neighborhood. The distinct linear path of the former runway has been repurposed into city streets and is now covered with residential and commercial buildings. No remnants of the runway, taxiways, or terminal buildings exist. The airport's 'ghost' is only visible in the alignment of the modern street grid that follows its former path.
GUXN was the original and principal airport for Kankan, the second-largest city in Guinea and a crucial administrative and commercial hub for the Upper Guinea region. Established likely during the French colonial period, it was a vital piece of infrastructure connecting the remote interior with the capital, Conakry. The airport primarily handled domestic flights for government officials, mail transport, and limited passenger and cargo services. It would have accommodated smaller propeller-driven aircraft of the era, such as the Douglas DC-3, serving as a key link in the national transportation network before being made obsolete by urban growth and aviation technology advancements.
There are zero plans or prospects for reopening Kankan Airport (GUXN). The land has been completely absorbed by the city of Kankan and is now a developed urban area. Furthermore, the city and region are adequately served by the active Kankan Diankana Airport (GUXK), which has a longer runway and modern facilities capable of handling current air traffic needs. Reopening the old site is physically and logistically impossible.